Re:Coronavirus-afflicted global economy is almost certainly ...
by pmiller2 on Thursday April 16, 2020 @01:37AM
(#22886443)
How does median vs mean matter here? Maybe only 50% of people are completely fucked? Big deal; I know the CEOs and software engineers are doing fine.
Re:Coronavirus-afflicted global economy is almost certainly ...
by ls612 on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:36PM
(#22891101)
Because high skilled workers have seen both their productivity and income rise substantially. The median and other lower skilled workers have not. This will lead to an increasing average but a stagnant median, but it doesn’t mean that the idea people are mostly paid based on productivity is wrong.
Re:Coronavirus-afflicted global economy is almost certainly ...
by pmiller2 on Thursday April 16, 2020 @07:11PM
(#22894534)
I never claimed that. I claimed that workers generally are no longer reaping the benefits of increased productivity. If you want to offer income inequality as an explanation, then I'd be interested to hear how you work that all out, and if the math adds up. But, my contention that all the gains from increased productivity are going to those at the top seems to be exactly what you are espousing, yes? Are you agreeing with me in different words, or am I misunderstanding?
Re:Coronavirus-afflicted global economy is almost certainly ...
by imtringued on Thursday April 16, 2020 @03:51AM
(#22887125)
It doesn't matter if you compare incompatible measures. As long as past values are better than present values we are on a downwards trend.
There is actually fairly weak data to support the popular theory of a decreasing labor share of income (and thus an increasing capital share) causing more inequality and to the extent such an effect could exist its size is only a few percent of GDP over the past few decades.