Re:Programming languages are not languages (2018)
by godelski on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @01:13PM
(#22880318)
> Well, the ability to communicate with others. Transferring and receiving the state of our mind and emotions to others.
But again, why does this require speech? There's sign language. There's braille. Are neither of these languages?
What I'm trying to say is that this isn't really a simple question. We've clearly thrown out the dictionary definition of a language, but these restrictions seem arbitrarily created to disclude programming languages but the way they're done also disclude things we do consider languages. Verbal communication seems like a strange restriction.
But again, why does this require speech? There's sign language. There's braille. Are neither of these languages?
What I'm trying to say is that this isn't really a simple question. We've clearly thrown out the dictionary definition of a language, but these restrictions seem arbitrarily created to disclude programming languages but the way they're done also disclude things we do consider languages. Verbal communication seems like a strange restriction.