Re:March 2020 was the first March without a school shooting ...
by rhizome on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:23PM
(#22883808)
>positions generally are not at all anti-gun they are anti-private individual
Well that's definitely a stream of apophasis that doesn't address my question, but maybe we can save it if you describe where you draw the line between anti-gun and "anti-private individual." IME they are always conflated within the discourse.
If you're implying a hypocrisy in supporting police having guns but people not, I don't agree, but even without that I'm fine if all guns go away. Does that now make my question answerable for you?
Re:March 2020 was the first March without a school shooting ...
by zepto on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @09:38PM
(#22885227)
I’m indeed implying the hypocrisy. I’m also fine with all guns going away. However nobody who is anti-gun is suggesting that in reality.
I guess it all depends on how much you trust your government and police. Anti-gun sentiment seem to be about forcing the views of those who have reason to trust them, onto those who don’t, at gunpoint no less.
That seems wrong to me.
It’s that anti-gun positions generally are not at all anti-gun they are anti-private individual, but happy for the state to use guns, and thus to be the sole arbiter of who is defended and who is defenseless.