News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through postpandemic period. Parent comment

Re:Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 throug... by JetSetWilly on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:25PM (#22879659)
They did two independent assays so I would think the false positives rate should be far below 1% - certainly the authors seem to think so.

Secondly if they were false positives, I would expect them to be randomly distributed. Not concentrated in the affluent capital city, and not solely in the second cohort with none in the early march cohort (as you would predict if exponential growth is occurring).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 throug... by tgb on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:35PM (#22879791)
Why even test 100 controls if your conclusion relies on a prior that false-positives are much less than 1%? I think that shows the author's are worried about false-positives and have failed to rule them out sufficiently.

Your second two points are fairly compelling.

[ Parent | on HN ]