News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by nicoburns on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @11:45AM (#22879115)
> One thing that I think has been lost in photography today thanks to the smartphone is the value of high quality lenses

Indeed, I have a Lumix LX3 from 2008. The sensor in my smartphone is better, as are the quality of the photos in low-light, and the autofocus is much faster. But in good lighting conditions, the photos from the LX3 are much higher quality.

Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by slantyyz on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:06PM (#22879395)
I have an LX3 too. It's still a great camera.

If you shoot RAW and use a fairly recent Lightroom equivalent application that has good noise reduction, etc., you can still get the LX3 to shoot above its weight.

One thing in particular that I like about the LX3 is that the black and white mode is a surprisingly fun mode to shoot in. In fact, one novel way of using the LX3 in 2020 would be as a dedicated black and white camera.

Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by jacobush on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:14PM (#22879517)
I sometimes use my Canon 100D in BW, just to not cheat, and commit to a look beforehand. Makes you think of the subject slightly differently, just like when you shot on BW film.
Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by ashtonkem on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:08PM (#22879431)
Off camera, smart phones produce better photos; the on board software is much better.

But once in the hands of someone who knows how to process their photos, dedicated cameras win every single time.

Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by jacobush on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:19PM (#22879583)
But composition is step #0. :-) I have taken some of my best shots on my iPhone 7. But there's no joy, maybe because of shutter lag. And also the good image to bad image ratio for me is horrible. Maybe 2000 deliberate shots per year and a handful keepers.
Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by ashtonkem on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:22PM (#22879626)
I think that single purpose devices create more deliberate and mindful behavior. Thus even if the nominal task is completed successfully, the result just doesn’t feel right.

Example: I can and have read books on my iPhone, but I find the result subpar compared to reading on Kindle or dead tree. Even though I technically completed my task, the experience of completing it wasn’t what I would’ve had on a single purpose device.

Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by slantyyz on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @01:17PM (#22880371)
But once out in the real world, the camera you actually have with you wins every time.
Re:Nikon's 300mm F/2 by ashtonkem on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @04:23PM (#22882585)
I’ve never been convinced by this argument, because you control what camera you have with you. It’s not like the universe will surprise you by teleporting your camera to Pluto without warning.

If you’re into photography, you’ll find a way to have your preferred camera on you more often. Pre-quarantine I carried mine daily.

If you’re not into photography, you’ll have your cell phone, and that’s ok too.