News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Programming languages are not languages (2018) by hutzlibu on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @07:41AM (#22876601)
No I did not. But in the end, when it gets compiled, every word is clearly defined, or not?
Re:Programming languages are not languages (2018) by grawprog on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @10:06AM (#22877802)
>C11(ISO/IEC 9899:201x) §3.4.3

>1 undefined behavior

>behavior, upon use of a non portable or erroneous program construct or of erroneous data, for which this International Standard imposes no requirements

>2 NOTE Possible undefined behavior ranges from ignoring the situation completely with unpredictable results, to behaving during translation or program execution in a documented manner characteristic of the environment (with or without the issuance of a diagnostic message), to terminating a translation or execution (with the issuance of a diagnostic message).

>3 EXAMPLE An example of undefined behavior is the behavior on integer overflow.

Re:Programming languages are not languages (2018) by hutzlibu on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @02:20PM (#22881142)
"EXAMPLE An example of undefined behavior is the behavior on integer overflow."

Yeah, that is obvious, but is there a example, where a defined variable is not clear defined and ambigious?