Re:Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
by gbear605 on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @12:41PM
(#22868116)
Declaring it with a custom struct:
int raw_arr[4] = {0,0,0,0};
struct SmartArray arr;
arr.length = 4;
arr.val = raw_arr;
some_function(arr);
Smart declaration with custom type: (assume that they'll come up with a good syntax) smart_int_arr arr[4] = {0,0,0,0};
some_function(arr);
With the custom struct, it requires the number `4` to be typed twice manually, while in the second it only needs a single input.
Re:Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
by fkeeal on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:35PM
(#22883930)
You actually never need to specify the size explicitly in C.
Here are some other ways to declare your struct without needing as much boiler plate per declaration.
#define MAKE_SMARTARRAY(_smartarr, _array) \
do {\
_smartarr.val = (_array);\
_smartarr.len = sizeof((_array))/sizeof((_array[0]));\
}while(0)
struct SmartArray
{
int *val;
int len;
};
int main()
{
int array[] = {0,0,0,0};
struct SmartArray arr = {.val = array,
.len = sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0])};
struct SmartArray arr2;
struct SmartArray arr3;
MAKE_SMARTARRAY(arr2, ((int[]){5,6,7,8}));
MAKE_SMARTARRAY(arr3, array);
return 0;
}
Re:Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
by flatfinger on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @08:45PM
(#22873196)
How about having an attribute which, if applied to a structure that contains a `T*` and an integer type, would allow a `T[]` to be implicitly converted to that structure type?
And having a special data-and-length type would make these guarantees... how? You're ultimately going to need to be able to create these objects from bare data and length somehow, so it's a case of garbage-in-garbage-out.