Re:Comparing HTTP/3 vs. HTTP/2 Performance
by PudgePacket on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @09:11AM
(#22865441)
Based on Google's earlier testing HTTP/3 excels in poor-performing networks where dropped packets are more likely or more costly. Cloudflare's blog didn't mention this point at all.
> On a well-optimized site like Google Search, connections are often pre-established, so QUIC’s faster connections can only speed up some requests—but QUIC still improves mean page load time by 8% globally, and up to 13% in regions where latency is higher.
> On a well-optimized site like Google Search, connections are often pre-established, so QUIC’s faster connections can only speed up some requests—but QUIC still improves mean page load time by 8% globally, and up to 13% in regions where latency is higher.
https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2018/06/Introducing-QUI...
Another summary: https://kinsta.com/blog/http3/
Older Cloudflare blog: https://blog.cloudflare.com/http3-the-past-present-and-futur...