News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by mehrdadn on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @05:03AM (#22863955)
Vietnamese only became Latin alphabet recently (100 years ago). In fact it's always completely jarring for me to see Latin or Cyrillic characters for languages like Vietnamese [1] or Turkish [2]—about as jarring as it would be to see English written in Arabic characters. So much that, if you asked me what alphabets these languages use without giving me much of a chance to think, I would probably still intuitively reply that they use something close to Chinese or Arabic, completely forgetting the whole story changed a hundred years ago.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%E1%BB%AF_N%C3%B4m

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Turkish_alphabet

Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by riffraff on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @05:52AM (#22864178)
I understand the feeling for Vietnamese which is a tonal language, and indeed has a ton of "weird" annotations on the basic characters which make the usage of the latin glyphs pointless.

But Turkish seems to fit a latin script quite well, and the previous Arabic/Persian wasn't a "native" script for a Turkic language either, I think.

Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by pas on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @06:19AM (#22864306)
Why does it make latin glyphs pointless? Isn't it better to have a closer match to the phonemes that one actually has to say than having ideoglyphs? (Which are harder to learn, because writing and speaking becomes only loosely coupled.)
Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by robocat on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @07:02AM (#22864576)
These are the written vowels:

Aa Ăă Ââ Ee Êê Ii Oo Ôô Ơơ Uu Ưư Yy

On each of which you can add 5 different tone marks: https://vietnamesetypography.com/alphabet/

Plus there are diphthongs and triphthongs (look at the zero coda and off glide coda columns): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamese_phonology#ref_Notes

Disclaimer: I know stuff all about Tiếng Việt, but it seemed really hard to learn how to hear and say the sounds when I tried for a few days with private lessons. Using so many diacritics modifies the Latin alphabet so much that it becomes something else...

Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by Symbiote on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @08:55AM (#22865249)
It would be interesting to compare Khmer script with Vietnamese.

The Khmer alphabet seems to have 33 consonant letters, 15 vowels, 16 "dependent vowels" (which look to attach like an accent to a consonant), and 12 diacritics.

Since I don't have any knowledge of either language, I don't know if this is better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_script

Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by pas on Thursday April 16, 2020 @04:32AM (#22887345)
Thanks! Since there are already many different languages using latin script I'm not surprised that this very heavily annotated version too differs. (I'm Hungarian, so maybe that's why I prefer explicit markings for pronunciation.)
Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by freddie_mercury on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @09:34AM (#22865719)
The "weird" annotations are (almost) all part of regular Latin glyphs, which is unsurprising since the Portuguese who created modern written Vietnamese patterned it after Portuguese.
Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by literallycancer on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @06:40AM (#22864450)
If weird annotations can work for slightly different phonemes in Orthographia Bohemica and for Zamenhof, I'm sure you would be able to use them for tones as well.
Re:Mongolia to restore traditional alphabet by riffraff on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @11:40PM (#22874273)
You can, it's how it's done, but it means someone who knows any other language using the Latin script still can't read it.

A speaker of French, Polish, German, Hungarian or Turkish can muddle through trying to pronounce another European language using the Latin script and get 95% of it but will have no idea of how to read Vietnamese.