News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ... by jrockway on Friday April 10, 2020 @11:25AM (#22833975)
People do lots of stuff sick. That is why we have pandemics. Do airlines refund your ticket because you're feeling a little under the weather? Nope. So you infect the entire plane-load of people. Do bosses or customers like it when you're gone for two weeks because of a cold? Nope. So you go to work sick and a week later, everyone in your office is sick. The incentives are always aligned towards loading yourself up on cold medicine and going about your day. No company is willing to take the financial hit for public health.

If people disappeared into self-isolation whenever they had a sniffle, many diseases would be completely eradicated. They don't, so they aren't. (Yes, I know the flu can jump between humans and birds and back, so isolation wouldn't eradicate the flu. But a lot of other diseases would be completely gone.)

Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ... by gwbas1c on Saturday April 11, 2020 @12:13PM (#22842397)
Usually symptoms linger long after you're contagious
Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ... by rriepe on Friday April 10, 2020 @11:53AM (#22834279)
I don't think this is right. Getting sick significantly more or less can be a drawback at the individual level. Your hypothetical self-isolating people would be more sickly.

Most of the work humanity does against a given pathogen is in getting sick. We've recently automated that. But our immune systems are still out there fighting the good fight every cold/flu season.

The ideal season for an individual is one where you get exposed but don't develop symptoms, not one where you never get exposed. Not getting exposed is like missing a ski trip-- a terrible outcome to be avoided at all costs.