Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ...
by ericd on Friday April 10, 2020 @04:48PM
(#22837195)
>There is a lot of crap, but science Twitter is also the only reason I'm on it. Sadly, my own biases against Twitter Kept me off it for 8+ years, but after I started finding the right people to follow, a whole new world opened up, and it is now a vital tool for me to navigate the literature and learn quickly which new tools are best.
That's really interesting, I've been avoiding Twitter for the same reason, but I can see how it'd help keep up with fast-moving niche fields. Maybe I'll give it a try, thanks!
Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ...
by random314 on Friday April 10, 2020 @06:06PM
(#22837801)
How does it compare with following the same account on Facebook?
Re:SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected ...
by epistasis on Friday April 10, 2020 @06:13PM
(#22837851)
I don't know of anybody that uses Facebook for science discussion, but I did know many that were using Twitter for science, which is what finally drew me in.
Facebook seems like a much worse fit than even Twitter for discussion, but I would potentially check it out if somebody I trusted had found it useful.
Science is the ultimate long-tail of super-specialized interests with extremely small audiences, and Twitter is perfect for connecting those people with extremely esoteric interests.
There is a lot of crap, but science Twitter is also the only reason I'm on it. Sadly, my own biases against Twitter Kept me off it for 8+ years, but after I started finding the right people to follow, a whole new world opened up, and it is now a vital tool for me to navigate the literature and learn quickly which new tools are best.