Re:Temporal circuit of brain activity supports human conscio...
by petervm on Friday April 10, 2020 @08:24AM
(#22832303)
After posting my comment yesterday, I read some of your other comments and I don't think we actually disagree.
The problem is probably the definition of "real".
I'm not arguing that consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe when I say it is real. The jury is still out but that's not what interests me the most. When I say "real" I'm talking about my subjective experience. It is real in the sense that it is something that I know I experience, regardless of the mechanisms involved.
Ultimately, what I'm interested in is finding out how it arises. Explaining it. Reducing it to its "third-party objective facts" if possible. Being able to look at a machine that mimics us and tell if that machine is experiencing something comparable to what we experience.
Re:Temporal circuit of brain activity supports human conscio...
by naasking on Friday April 10, 2020 @12:16PM
(#22834481)
This might be a fun read for you then: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/k0711/kf_articles/blob/m...
Re:Temporal circuit of brain activity supports human conscio...
by petervm on Friday April 10, 2020 @02:01PM
(#22835589)
Will do, thanks!
Re:Temporal circuit of brain activity supports human conscio...
by kordlessagain on Thursday April 09, 2020 @10:42PM
(#22829466)
Can you visualize a car?
> Why not both?
Because those are mutually exclusive options. Either something is ontologically fundamental, or it's not. It can't be both.