YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview

Re:YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview by atomi on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @02:11PM (#22805804)

I don't know how many times it needs to be said.

An entity has the inherent right to control what is on it's own property. Full stop gentlemen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview by legostormtroopr on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @06:20PM (#22808065)

Then that entity becomes responsible for everything on its property as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview by amanaplanacanal on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @11:25AM (#22813730)

Tradition and law both disagree with you. Perhaps it should be the way you say, but it isn't now and never has been.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview by julybuffalo on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @11:53AM (#22814032)

Is the NYT responsible for its content?

Why isn't YouTube a publisher now rather than a protected platform?

Why couldn't the NYT justify itself as a platform instead of a publisher if YouTube is a platform?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview by axguscbklp on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @07:12PM (#22808466)

Doesn't mean I have to like them when they do.

[ Parent | on HN ]