News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Containers vs. Zones vs. Jails vs. VMs (2017) by barbecue_sauce on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @02:51AM (#22800912)
So many people don't seem to understand that artifact distribution is the compelling feature of Docker.
Re:Containers vs. Zones vs. Jails vs. VMs (2017) by imtringued on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @03:24AM (#22801053)
And if you want to have artifacts you also need a way to build them... Running containers is just one third of the features that docker offers.
Re:Containers vs. Zones vs. Jails vs. VMs (2017) by gwd on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @03:49AM (#22801184)
Exactly. Containers were around for at least a decade before Docker, just like mp3's were around for decades before the iPod. Docker's simple, efficient way to package containers were the key to their explosion.
Re:Containers vs. Zones vs. Jails vs. VMs (2017) by irishsultan on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @04:40AM (#22801434)
> , just like mp3's were around for decades before the iPod

That sounded wrong intuitively, so I decided to look it up: Wikipedia claims that mp3 was initially released in 1993, and the iPod was initially released in 2001, so not decades and not even a full decade.

Re:Containers vs. Zones vs. Jails vs. VMs (2017) by gwd on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @07:07AM (#22802137)
Thanks for the correction. For some reason I thought that the patents on mp3 compression were issued in the 80's, but there's nothing in the Wikipedia article which specifically says that.

The point stands though, that Docker didn't invent containers by a long shot; but they did make them massively more useful.