Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume
by secabeen on Monday April 06, 2020 @09:38PM
(#22799621)
A lot of the challenges come out of the specifics of the laws surrounding unions. They were written in a much rougher era, where corporations and unions were very much in direct opposition. If we could re-write those laws, we could open the door to much more cooperative relationships between unions that the current laws do not allow. Unfortunately, there's no sign of the republican and democratic parties getting together to make a grand bargain on the laws, so we're stuck with them as they are today.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume
by perl4ever on Monday April 06, 2020 @10:13PM
(#22799782)
"much more cooperative relationships between unions"
Sure, cooperation sounds good in theory, but don't we have examples (in the US) of where management of a company and management of their union ended up very friendly at the expense of the workers? I'm pretty sure I read about stuff like that in the context of the recent automotive union corruption scandals.
Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume
by secabeen on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @05:27PM
(#22817356)
I'm thinking more like things like works councils, and other ways that the employees could play more of a role in running the company, rather than the adversarial setup we have now. Here's an article from 1981 that gives some background:
https://digitalcommons.law.msu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic...
Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume
by wegs on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @10:43AM
(#22813356)
Past performance isn't always indicative of future performance. Cultures and worlds change. In many cases, people confuse poor concepts with poor execution (or vice-versa: bad concept with excellent execution or good luck can be successful).
I say try it maybe in one state and see how it goes.