All models are wrong, but some are completely wrong

Re:All models are wrong, but some are completely wrong by deltron3030 on Monday April 06, 2020 @01:34AM (#22791139)

>So the question is obviously, how do we change the news ecosystem from what it is, to a system that makes people better informed?

By bettering basic education. People could learn the relationships and interdependecies of the system and society itself, including the role of information. Why not learn everything through RPGs?

This would create a demand for better news sources in the long term.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:All models are wrong, but some are completely wrong by kerkeslager on Monday April 06, 2020 @09:07AM (#22793353)

I don't understand your reasoning for why you think better basic education would increase demand for more informative news sources. Could you explain more?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:All models are wrong, but some are completely wrong by deltron3030 on Friday April 17, 2020 @06:43AM (#22897852)

Sorry for replying late.

Because education increases environmental awareness, and informative news provides it. So you'd want informative news to remain environmentally aware.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:All models are wrong, but some are completely wrong by Proziam on Monday April 06, 2020 @02:32AM (#22791351)

The most educated people I know all have at least a handful of opinions that are provably untrue. We're talking about people who correctly modeled economic crashes, developed and implemented SAP modules for a lot of companies you know, and (multiple on some of them) PHDs. Among them, a flat-earther, a guy who believes communism is straight-up awesome, and one who honestly believes that most "corruption" is a made-up attack on the corrupt.

Each time I encounter this, I am stunned. But it still happens.

[ Parent | on HN ]