Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Security and Privacy Implications of Zoom. Parent comment
No, that's not "fair enough".
> They failed to recognise AES-EDC can be attacked by very motivated cryptanalysts? Alright.
No "motivated cryptanalysts" have put time into looking at yet.
> They gathered a little bit more data than they claim they did? Well, who is not doing that?
People who care about your privacy?
> I think they proved they can be agile.
They proved they could fix things that they lied or were clearly shady as soon as the media got wind of it?
> Do we need E2EE for that? probably not, but that is my choice.
It is your choice, but you have the right to make an informed choice. Zoom lied and prevented people from doing this.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
No, that's not "fair enough".
> They failed to recognise AES-EDC can be attacked by very motivated cryptanalysts? Alright.
No "motivated cryptanalysts" have put time into looking at yet.
> They gathered a little bit more data than they claim they did? Well, who is not doing that?
People who care about your privacy?
> I think they proved they can be agile.
They proved they could fix things that they lied or were clearly shady as soon as the media got wind of it?
> Do we need E2EE for that? probably not, but that is my choice.
It is your choice, but you have the right to make an informed choice. Zoom lied and prevented people from doing this.