Re:Nim 1.2
by zelphirkalt on Friday April 03, 2020 @02:43PM
(#22772699)
Personally I stopped using exercism, when it started to require me to work for Google for free and would not let me log in, if I did not. It's not an ethical platform, unfortunately.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Exercism co-founder here. We get bots spamming the site in every way possible if we don't have a recaptcha. Happy to accept other suggestions for stopping bots signing up if you have any more ethical alternatives that are as an effective?
Re:Nim 1.2
by mikebelanger on Friday April 03, 2020 @02:49PM
(#22772770)
What do you mean by 'work for Google for free?' I don't see that being required anywhere on the site.
Probably it is a reference to the reCapcha hell Google may drop you into if you are deemed "suspicious"
Re:Nim 1.2
by mikebelanger on Monday April 06, 2020 @05:23PM
(#22798037)
ah ok. I never saw those captcha things as work per say, but yeah I guess they are. Free work for some model data somewhere.
>it started to require me to work for Google for free
How did that work?
Re:Nim 1.2
by zelphirkalt on Friday April 03, 2020 @02:48PM
(#22772764)
Recaptcha and tracking.
Re:Nim 1.2
by ampdepolymerase on Friday April 03, 2020 @03:16PM
(#22773016)
Would you pay monthly if they removed it?
Re:Nim 1.2
by zelphirkalt on Friday April 03, 2020 @05:07PM
(#22773966)
Perhaps I would. I've supported many projects in the past, so I think, if it was really good and did not violate my privacy, there is a fair chance I would.
Re:Nim 1.2
by tedunangst on Friday April 03, 2020 @10:41PM
(#22775782)
Many of the sites that force me through recaptcha are services I'm already paying for. They won't let me login until I identify all the targets.