News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To make the perfect mirror, physicists confront the myste... by mannykannot on Friday April 03, 2020 @01:46PM (#22772083)
I was wondering whether a design using total internal reflection within 90-degree prisms at each end of the arms would be feasible for an instrument of this precision. I assume it is not, and I have a few guesses as to why not: 1) the Fabry-Perot resonator arrangement of mirrors in each arm creates a much higher intensity between the mirrors, and this is important for getting a measurable signal out; 2) the resonator rejects a lot of noise; 3) there's no good way to get power into, and a signal out of, an arrangement of prisms; 4) an arrangement of prisms puts too much glass in the path. I would be interested in hearing what the actual answer is.

Update: there's a lot more information here (though it is about the Advanced LIGO concept), but I don't think it addresses the failings of a prism arrangement directly:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/34/1/01...

Re:To make the perfect mirror, physicists confront the myste... by chris_va on Friday April 03, 2020 @03:27PM (#22773124)
AR coatings are not perfect at the interface boundary (kind of the same problem as a perfect mirror in reverse), plus glass has attenuation.
Re:To make the perfect mirror, physicists confront the myste... by mannykannot on Friday April 03, 2020 @07:34PM (#22774939)
I get the point about glass attenuation, but with regard to AR (anti-reflection?) coatings, are you referring to the surface through which light enters the prisms? If those surfaces are normal to the laser beam, would the reflected light not still be contained within the beam path, just as it is in the case of a Fabry-Perot resonator?
Re:To make the perfect mirror, physicists confront the myste... by chris_va on Monday April 06, 2020 @04:33PM (#22797523)
Yes, but at the wrong path length (and offset by some vector, if you had a TIR cube)