News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by Causality1 on Thursday April 02, 2020 @02:00AM (#22756598)
... But if they're violating the rules in some other way why wouldn't they also encrypt?
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by tlrobinson on Thursday April 02, 2020 @02:16AM (#22756669)
You have it backwards. They can't violate the rules now because it would be obvious. If encryption were allowed it would be impossible to know if a transmission is violating certain rules or not.
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by Causality1 on Thursday April 02, 2020 @04:39AM (#22757197)
Like what? Plotting to kill somebody over the radio? Logically there must be rules about hogging spectrum or harassing people but I'm having a hard time imagining how encryption could stop someone from knowing if you're breaking another law.
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by dannypgh on Thursday April 02, 2020 @07:52AM (#22758052)
Commercial usage of amateur bands is prohibited. How can you tell if communication is commercial if you can't understand what's being communicated?
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by yipbub on Thursday April 02, 2020 @02:19AM (#22756682)
AFAIK encryption doesn't hide you if you're broadcasting; you can be found with a directional antenna.
Re:FCC planning to open up 1200 MHz of spectrum for unlicens... by luxpir on Thursday April 02, 2020 @03:11AM (#22756887)
You can be located pretty trivially, encryption or not. Look up fox-hunting (radio version).