Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi

Re:Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi by fulafel on Thursday April 02, 2020 @12:33AM (#22756222)

C/C++ implemented custom protocols, no webrtc... What explains these security and compatibility compromises?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi by kelnos on Thursday April 02, 2020 @03:41AM (#22756986)

The first commit was in late 2004, which was well before WebRTC was a thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi by wagaf on Thursday April 02, 2020 @10:41AM (#22759506)

Jami uses standard protocols like TLS, x509, SIP, SRTP..

It's actually much more standard-compliant than most alternatives.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi by yjftsjthsd-h on Thursday April 02, 2020 @01:26AM (#22756466)

I'd guess that it predates webrtc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jami: GNU end-to-end encrypted alternative to Zoom and Jitsi by mehrdadn on Thursday April 02, 2020 @05:00AM (#22757298)

Aside from the anachronism, didn't WebRTC itself have security issues?

[ Parent | on HN ]