Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by fortran77 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @06:38PM
(#22754230)
And higher quality. They have official specs, so there can be multiple suppliers. Competition leads to quality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by tcbasche on Thursday April 02, 2020 @12:46AM
(#22756281)
Without getting too philosophical, I would say the best quality language is the one you can most confidently write in that can solve your problem.
Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by quelltext on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @08:32PM
(#22755069)
PHP has a spec?
Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by mappu on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:03PM
(#22755880)
The official one is here: https://github.com/php/php-langspec
It was pushed quite strongly around the time when HHVM was striving for high compatibility with PHP (they've since dropped that goal).
Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by quelltext on Thursday April 02, 2020 @12:23PM
(#22760678)
That's cool. I had to learn some intricacies of PHP for a job once quite a while ago and the docs weren't quite sufficient. Could have used that. Language specs are typically harder to digest then other material but ultimately you can get all the details out of them you need and they're typically worth reading.
Re:Viability of Unpopular Programming Languages (2018)
by DonHopkins on Thursday April 02, 2020 @03:22AM
(#22756920)
No, just a hammer.