Re:Signaling as a Service
by Sophistifunk on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @04:06AM
(#22746691)
How could this theory be applied to fund dev tools, I wonder?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I remember for a while it seemed like every conference talk on Ruby (and/or Rails) involved someone dropping into Textmate and showing off something cool. I'm sure people weren't using it just to show off - but it was good marketing for a product in a space where most folks use free editors. Now I'm looking back and seeing it through the lens of signalling. I suppose they were sending a message that it's worth spending something for your tools.
Re:Signaling as a Service
by satanspastaroll on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @05:59AM
(#22747165)
As signaling is the opposite of practical, it's like asking how kryptonite could best help superman
Re:Signaling as a Service
by Sophistifunk on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @07:40PM
(#22754722)
Nice in theory, but the people who write dev tools still need to pay the rent.
Re:Signaling as a Service
by satanspastaroll on Thursday April 02, 2020 @09:07AM
(#22758477)
I'm not sure I get what you mean. It's just that it's incredibly difficult to signal anything with a tool that exists for the sole purpose of utility. It's like trying to sell cotton with signaling; it doesen't really raise any kinds of emotion