Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by devonbleak on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:30PM
(#22742839)
Embedded corporate interests and lobbies fighting against solutions because it'll cost them money to implement or lower their revenue once implemented. The usual.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by throwaway894345 on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:34PM
(#22742867)
What solutions does Europe, etc have that the US doesn't? Genuine question.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by michaelbuckbee on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:36PM
(#22742886)
A working legislature?
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by throwaway894345 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @10:24AM
(#22748807)
Clever. What solutions has said legislature come up?
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by throwaway894345 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @12:56PM
(#22750852)
*come up with? (apparently I missed the edit window)
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by thomasfortes on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:40PM
(#22742931)
Don't know about Europe, in Brazil spam calls are common but you can register your number in a consumer protection organ to say that you do not want unwanted commercial calls and if you keep receiving them the companies can be fined, for me it works "ok", there still companies that don't give a shit but at least the amount of calls I receive was reduced a lot...
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by kube-system on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @06:02PM
(#22743159)
The US did this before most countries, actually. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Do_Not_Call_Registry
Most US spam calls originate outside of the US, though.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by Elv13 on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:42PM
(#22742965)
* Not directly related to SPIT (phone SPAM), but one is https://www.wired.com/story/sim-swap-fix-carriers-banks/ .
* Carrier maintainer blacklists and other tools have also been used by providers for a long time.
* My provider, Voip.ms, enforces a provenance whitelist by default. This block all SPIT calls coming from unspoofed caller ids. That may not sound like a lot, but yes, many of those calls are just random poeple picking their phone or mobile apps using the real phone number. Having regulation to track internal sources of SPIT (and enforcing it) helps too.
* In Canada, you can subscribe to a non-telemarketing list. That doesn't help for scammer, but it helps for unsolicited ads, political spam and private surveys. This works when enforced with actual penalties for all parties involved.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by kube-system on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:53PM
(#22743066)
Canada's non-telemarketing list that was implemented in 2004 is essentially a copy of the US legislation that was passed the year prior. It doesn't help though, as neither the US nor Canada have jurisdiction in India, et al.