News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal hacking. Parent comment

Re:Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal... by WrtCdEvrydy on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @01:28PM (#22739959)
Who charged you? Infragard's sole job is to facilitate data transfer between industry and the feds to ensure there's security at every layer. That's some weapons grade bullshit right there.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal... by CiPHPerCoder on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @01:30PM (#22739990)
> Who charged you?

Sylint pressed the charges through the FBI.

Originally, they also insisted I caused damage days before the date of incident and tried to tack on $32k in damages. I pointed out that I do not possess a time machine, and they shifted it from (June 18-24) to (June 21-27) and lowered the dollar amount to $9k.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal... by icheishvili on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @03:44PM (#22741648)
Too late now, but would it have been useful/possible to go public about it or threaten to talk the media and cause way worse problems for them? Considering that security is their game, I wonder if the bad PR would've made them re-think targeting you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal... by CiPHPerCoder on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @04:20PM (#22742077)
I was too depressed and scared to consider that then.

I haven't really thought about that angle since, either.

[ Parent | on HN ]