News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6 by mcdevilkiller on Monday March 30, 2020 @02:39PM (#22730836)
I id have some problems with algo behind a NAT. Though my usecase is a bit different, more of a road warrior, as I wanted to be able to access a server in one property (behind NAT) from my home PC (also NAT). I suppose I just need port forwarding.
Re:WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6 by L_Rahman on Monday March 30, 2020 @03:48PM (#22731586)
I was in a similar situation. Port forwarding worked perfectly. In my case the server I was trying to access was behind an ISP (Comcast) managed NAT so I had to go through them to open the port. Much to my surprise they were extremely helpful and understanding of the request.
Re:WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6 by joombaga on Monday March 30, 2020 @06:18PM (#22732792)
Was this residential or business? I didn't know there were Comcast managed NATs beyond their internal network.