Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @11:50AM
(#22711835)
How much does the quality of sampling influence the result with this machine? You're saying testing at work could be done, but what if the swab is not taken properly? Wouldn't that create a false negative?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by ineedasername on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:12PM
(#22712017)
That would be the case with any testing protocol, and so to the extent that it's a problem, it is a problem already. It's also a solvable one: adequate training. And people right now have a very strong incentive to pay attention and learn it properly.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:19PM
(#22712091)
I'm am not saying this test is not valid, I'm critizing the claim that everything can resume by installing it at workplaces.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by chadmeister on Saturday March 28, 2020 @11:59AM
(#22711903)
This sounds like a much easier problem to solve than what we're dealing with now
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:09PM
(#22711987)
Sure, but if a non professional takes a bad swab on average it wouldn't be safe to talk about deploying these to workplaces and send people back to work like Trump wants to do. Even less if you think about these people testing positive after an hour of commute on public transport.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by chadmeister on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:14PM
(#22712041)
So we allocate 0.0001% of that 2 trillion stimulus package that just passed to educate and train people on it. Worst WORST case is nothing comparable to the worst case we could face otherwise. This is an insignificant problem.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:17PM
(#22712076)
It it still a worse case than people staying home and going to get tested properly at the doctor with this machine.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by chadmeister on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:34PM
(#22712210)
Look, you couldn't make a more wrong assertion. You would destroy countless more lives by keeping this quarantine going on indefinitely. Our economy would implode and we'd wind up in a situation far worse than what we saw during the great depression. We'd go into full stagflation and I guarantee the suicides alone would dwarf the possible death count from mass testing ppl with this device.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:44PM
(#22712290)
I am the first who wants everything to go back to normal. But have to be realistic with what is going to happen: saying that machines installed at workplaces is enough to end the pandemic is just an illusion.
As the comment made by the other user here says, it will create more waves. Now, that the damage to the economy is greater than the cost of healthcare and lives of a pandemic, that's an opinion you're not backing with data.
Also, I might be biased because I have people in my circle who are at risk, but I think a real solution is more structured than this. Machines + mandatory gloves and masks would be certainly better.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by briandear on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:13PM
(#22712034)
So close public transport. Touch of the US doesn’t use public transportation.
Re:FDA grants emergency use authorization for 5-13 minute Co...
by aledalgrande on Saturday March 28, 2020 @12:27PM
(#22712154)
That is just a single example. You go out with your car, you get a coffee in a crowded Starbucks, go to work and test positive. Now what? There's a new cluster.