Re:Singapore to Open Source Bluetooth Contact Tracing
by mardifoufs on Friday March 27, 2020 @01:39PM
(#22704957)
Wasn't the same said after 9/11 and the patriot act? I'd guess it was just a tin foil hat conspiracy to think several three letter agencies would use the provisions from the patriot act to track pretty much all communications? You can't just accuse people of being conspiracy theorists over and over again and tell them that this time would be different because... Reasons? Also, who needs martial law when you can just do the same with duly passed laws?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Singapore to Open Source Bluetooth Contact Tracing
by shadowgovt on Friday March 27, 2020 @03:39PM
(#22706081)
"Every time you give up a right, it's taken away forever" is still hyperbole.
People gave up the right to fly at all after 9/11. That was re-instituted for almost everyone in short order.
Re:Singapore to Open Source Bluetooth Contact Tracing
by SahAssar on Friday March 27, 2020 @06:47PM
(#22707591)
There is no right to fly. There was a right to privacy (at least as argued before the supreme court) and I think it could be said that is revoked because of the three-letter-agencies data collection that was justified by 9/11.
Re:Singapore to Open Source Bluetooth Contact Tracing
by lern_too_spel on Friday March 27, 2020 @06:18PM
(#22707426)
> I'd guess it was just a tin foil hat conspiracy to think several three letter agencies would use the provisions from the patriot act to track pretty much all communications?
It was and still is. How do you believe this nonsense?
Also, several provisions from the Patriot Act haven't been renewed, so your example proves my point.