News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blameless post-mortems and a just culture (2012) by viklove on Thursday March 26, 2020 @01:46AM (#22690995)
"Straight man" makes just as much sense as "devil's advocate," neither of them apply to a workplace situation. The former applies to comedy performances, and the latter applies to biblical characters. Neither can be used in a day-to-day setting according to you. You're drawing a distinction where one can't be made, probably because your ego is preventing you from admitting you're wrong. Have a nice day, I guess.

Oh wait, it's night time, so I shouldn't use that metaphor -- goodbye.

Re:Blameless post-mortems and a just culture (2012) by the_af on Thursday March 26, 2020 @02:09PM (#22696222)
> "Straight man" makes just as much sense as "devil's advocate,"

I disagree. It's easy to see why "straight man" doesn't make sense in this situation if you try to explain to me how it makes sense. I can't. I can explain how "devil's advocate" makes sense though: it means arguing the opposition to an idea not because you necessarily disagree, but because you want to explore the negatives/other possibilities. What does "straight man" mean to you?

> The former applies to comedy performances

Correct.

> the latter applies to biblical characters.

Incorrect. If you think this, you're confusing a metaphor's literal interpretation with its meaning.

"Have a nice day" isn't a metaphor, at this point it seems you're being purposefully obtuse.

Have a nice day!

Re:Blameless post-mortems and a just culture (2012) by viklove on Saturday March 28, 2020 @09:05PM (#22715534)
> straight man: the person in a comedy duo who speaks lines which give a comedian the opportunity to make jokes

All you have to do is change "comedy duo" to "coworker pair" and "jokes" to "explanation of architecture."

> devils advocate: the popular title of the person appointed by the Roman Catholic Church to challenge a proposed beatification or canonization, or the verification of a miracle

All you have to do is change "person appointed by the Roman Catholic Church" to "coworker" and "challenge a proposed beatification or canonization" to "challenge another person's ideas."

> purposefully obtuse

Is that worse than being unintentionally obtuse, like you're doing?

By the way, have you tried just looking up the word "metaphor?"

> a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.

Do you see the words at the end? "Not literally applicable."

Re:Blameless post-mortems and a just culture (2012) by the_af on Sunday March 29, 2020 @01:10PM (#22720616)
> All you have to do is change "comedy duo" to "coworker pair" and "jokes" to "explanation of architecture."

But that doesn't work, because it requires changing the meaning/imagery of the metaphor beyond what regular people would recognize. You know, what actually happened in the situation of the original post.

Yes, I can change "straight man" to "spaceship" and "jokes" to "launch into space", but it'd be almost as nonsensical.

> By the way, have you tried just looking up the word "metaphor?"

Yes. Note you misunderstand the definition you quoted. Let me say it once more, then we're done: the CONTEXT of a metaphor is not ITS LITERAL MEANING, so quit yapping about literalness. Context matters. "Straight man" doesn't have the required context, "devil's advocate" does.

I don't expect you to acknowledge what I'm saying. At this point I must assume your ego won't let you budge an inch. Have a nice day! (which is not a metaphor, by the way).