Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by progval on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @04:45PM
(#22678818)
First-party cookies aren't on the list of affected storage, are they?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by jefftk on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @05:06PM
(#22679004)
https://webkit.org/blog/8613/intelligent-tracking-prevention... already limited 1st party cookies set from JS to 7d.
This post is about them extending it to all storage set from JS.
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by shakna on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @09:42PM
(#22681197)
However any cookies set via HTTP, like http secureonly cookies that tend to be used for logging in, are exempt from that seven day limit.
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by jefftk on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @09:55PM
(#22681282)
Correct.
I expect companies will start working around this with CNAMEing and proxying, and I'm curious how Apple will handle it.
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by saagarjha on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @10:56PM
(#22681583)
I would expect the end game of this would be advertising networks injecting content directly into the page as it's rendered on the webserver. If they want tracking, at some point they'll just ask companies to hand over their logs…
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by jefftk on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @11:08PM
(#22681631)
Yes. Or sites just CNAMEing entirely over to their ad network, which then proxies the page content and inserts ads. Which are then, as a side effect, are very difficult to block.
And since they can easily correlate logs server side, they can track people between sites.
Re:Full third-party cookie blocking and more
by jessaustin on Wednesday March 25, 2020 @12:20AM
(#22681913)
Oh my, what a grim vision of the future. I'm going to stop recommending ad blockers, on the theory that I don't have to be faster than the bear...