News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by RobertRoberts on Monday March 23, 2020 @11:56PM (#22671722)
Consider this, if the news reported "Old people with pre-existing conditions should quarantine themselves because a deadly virus may kill them", that would be rational advice based on data.

Instead, the entire economy has been shut down, and the solution? Test everyone regardless of risk or value of testing. This is not rational, and many scientists and doctors are saying this.

Doctors and nurses should be tested regularly as they are more susceptible to contraction do to proximity, and the elderly or those in contact with areas of high infection or high risk of fatality.

Poorly reported sensationalism in the news needs a proper counter balance. And society needs something to overcome their power to induce irrational panic so easily.

Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by admax88q on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @12:35AM (#22671980)
> Instead, the entire economy has been shut down, and the solution?

The hospitals are being overrun.

Your whole comments just reads like you're upset that you can't go out with your friends anymore. "Why should I have to stay at home, its the old people that are in danger, they should have to stay home."

The hospitals are being overrun. That means that if left unchecked the virus overwhelms healthcare. Just yesterday we've hospitalized people in their 30s and 40s here. It's not just the old people who need intensive care. It seems to be its the old people who die even with intensive care.

Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by rwcarlsen on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @02:14AM (#22672448)
They are being overrun with panic of the citizenry in the U.S. so far - not with people needing hospital care. At least so says my E.R. doctor sister.
Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by acqq on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @05:18AM (#22673243)
At the moment, but the spread is exponential, and the U.S. in not an exception. It's just a matter of N days, where N is not a too big number. Everybody can do his own math, provided he understands the math enough.

But be aware of anybody who hasn't done the math. He simply doesn't know what he talks about.

Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by binaryone on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @02:48AM (#22672601)
>The hospitals are being overrun.

Which hospitals in the US are being overrun by Covid cases? Close friend works at a large hospital just north of Sacramento (near the first Covid death in California)... not a single Covid patient in their hospital. Heard a guy from NYU Lagone on the radio earlier - said they're nowhere near capacity. I'm not saying this isn't serious, but a lot of the rhetoric is alarmism with no basis in fact at this point.

Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by admax88q on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @10:08PM (#22681358)
"Were not overwhelmed yet so its fine"

Cases are still growing exponentially. The hospitals in Italy are being overrun. They were being overrun in China.

Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by empath75 on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @12:06AM (#22671793)
What harm is there in testing everyone?
Re:Covid-19: the harms of exaggerated information and non‐ev... by odkamkfn on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @12:11AM (#22671825)
If it can be done cheaply and easily while preventing additional infections, no harm at all. In fact, testing as many people as possible to isolate carriers is, I believe, the single best way to handle this crisis. It's not doable at this point, although hopefully we'll get there.