Re:NASA to launch 247 petabytes of data into AWS, but forgot...
by topkai22 on Monday March 23, 2020 @12:34AM
(#22661297)
I wasn't really sure what they pitched us technically, but your pitch sounds reasonable. It was also complete overkill- we were hosting
read only static images (map tiles). Azure and AWS were less than $300/TB/Year at the time, and their triple replication was more than what we needed availability wise.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.