Re:Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]
by litoE on Sunday March 22, 2020 @11:32PM
(#22661021)
I'm surprised there's no mention of eqn and troff.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]
by reikonomusha on Sunday March 22, 2020 @11:33PM
(#22661022)
Those are programs, not typefaces.
Re:Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]
by litoE on Sunday March 22, 2020 @11:36PM
(#22661034)
The author is talking about the difficulty of typesetting mathematics, and refers to TEX as an approach to solve this problem. eqn and troff preceded TEX. Heck, even Microsoft's and Open Office's approach to typing in equations are direct descendants of eqn.
Re:Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]
by mturmon on Monday March 23, 2020 @12:58AM
(#22661380)
I think the author is only interested in the box model that TeX uses insofar as it influenced the typeface design. He’s contrasting TeX’s “box and glue” setup with the rigid matrix design needed by Monotype faces, and the much more expressive non-box layout model used by Cambria.
Re:Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]
by reikonomusha on Monday March 23, 2020 @12:41AM
(#22661320)
Very true! Side note: I always admired the idea of eqn, loved reading about it from Kernighan and Cherry, but never saw it as powerful (or pretty) enough for serious use.