Re:Turns out claims Airbnb was taking houses out of the rent...
by poulsbohemian on Sunday March 22, 2020 @04:17AM
(#22653512)
You took my comments about my local market and twisted them to fit your argument about other markets. I assure you, the reduction in short-term rentals in my local market has not had the expected outcome. Source: I am both a landlord and a real estate agent in my local market. Likewise, look up the term “regulatory capture” if you want to understand what the hotels did here. Making a corona virus argument at this moment in time does not justify the actions taken by those hotels and city council 18 months ago.
Re:Turns out claims Airbnb was taking houses out of the rent...
by daun on Sunday March 22, 2020 @08:03AM
(#22654363)
What was the expected outcome, and what has ended up happening in your local market? Are people buying homes and just letting them sit vacant?
Re:Turns out claims Airbnb was taking houses out of the rent...
by poulsbohemian on Sunday March 22, 2020 @06:26PM
(#22659332)
The expectation was that Airbnb type properties would become available as long term rentals, and fewer people would turn dwelling into short-term rentals. But, those houses that were already in use for Airbnb remained so, and many houses in need of renovation that might have otherwise become rentals (long or short) instead sit dilapidated. Those cottages I mentioned end up difficult to move on the real estate market because they are just too small for most people’s needs - again, great for a weekend stay, not so great as ongoing living places. Our local market is a more “traditional” market than say California or what’s happened to Seattle and Vancouver, so of course our experience is going to be different.
Re:Turns out claims Airbnb was taking houses out of the rent...
by bernawil on Sunday March 22, 2020 @07:00PM
(#22659574)
> those houses that were already in use for Airbnb remained so
the lesson there is not to grandfather privileges if you want to actually fix something.
Re:Turns out claims Airbnb was taking houses out of the rent...
by kortilla on Sunday March 22, 2020 @01:51PM
(#22656909)
> Hotels cannot "capture" the market.
This happens all of the time. They frequently lobby cities to push out other short term rental options that they have difficulty competing with, which leads to regulatory capture.
This is a good thing. Because it means that the properties can be occupied by people actually living there.
We have a lot of cottages / really small properties here, that are good short-term rentals but not great regular rentals. so basically a lot of garbage rentals came available that did nothing to actually help our rental market.
Cottages are great rentals. They may not fit your needs, but in large cities, there will definitely be thousands or hundreds of people for who cottages are the perfect fit.
Most of what you describe is actually good for the rental market for the people actually living and working in the community.
The hotels knew they now had a more captive market than previously.
Hotels cannot "capture" the market. They are dependent on tourists coming in to the town, and that means that other parts of the town must provide a reason to visit. Right now, hotels are bleeding money.