Re:Coronavirus is not a good argument for quitting cash
by kd5bjo on Saturday March 21, 2020 @06:00AM
(#22645577)
It’s a war on cryptography, not cryptocurrency. Governments have gotten addicted to being able to intercept communications and feel threatened by any technology that might prevent them from doing that. This leads to all the positive uses being threatened because it’s extremely hard (or maybe impossible) to cripple nefarious uses without collateral damage to legitimate ones.
Re:Coronavirus is not a good argument for quitting cash
by IAmEveryone on Saturday March 21, 2020 @07:06AM
(#22645756)
Yeah, I may or may not have made the embarrassing mistake of misinterpreting which definition of “crypto” was intended. Although “encryption” would seem more natural under your interpretation?
I’d still object to the overused “war on..” phrasing for what’s a standard disagreement on policy. But substantively it’s obviously hard to deny that at least the US government is working against encryption.
Re:Coronavirus is not a good argument for quitting cash
by majewsky on Saturday March 21, 2020 @11:31AM
(#22647204)
The word "war on crypto" (or rather, "crypto wars") is well-established and has been for at least 25 years, possibly longer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_Wars
Re:Coronavirus is not a good argument for quitting cash
by bronipstid on Saturday March 21, 2020 @01:44AM
(#22644793)
Here's what your "democratically-legitimized PhD filled institutions" have cleverly orchestrated.
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/03/fed-announces-program...
I'll take the disinterested algorithm please.
They shut down the third-wave c-list-celebrity-endorsed token scams, yes. And when it became possible to do 6-figure money transfers with limited traceability and across borders, they forced exchanges to follow KYC laws. To the surprise of absolutely no one except people saying "taxation is theft" and thinking they are very clever, laws do apply online.
But a "war" it wasn't. The failure of cryptocurrencies to have any meaningful impact on the real world not measurable in cubic feet and degrees Celsius is to be found in its inability to be actually useful. Because the problems it was trying to solve never were problems: nobody needs a zero-trust payment solution because people do trust the banking system, to some degree. Nobody wants a currency completely separate from politics because the decisions of democratically legitimised institutions filled with PhDs tend to be at least slightly better than the arbitrarily set parameters of some algorithm that cannot be changed, or the feudalism of leaving all power in the hands of whoever has the most GPUs.