Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions...
by smilekzs on Friday March 20, 2020 @10:49PM
(#22643884)
I disagree. A raffle system, while inevitable in some cases (H-1B lottery comes to mind), is totally inappropriate when applied to a standardized test. Quite on the contrary, a standardized test aims to measure capability (however abstract it is), not luck.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions...
by mywittyname on Friday March 20, 2020 @11:53PM
(#22644275)
I think it's perfectly reasonable to go with a lottery system after some point. Most people with a ACT over ~30 are going to be completely capable of performing the coursework for an undergraduate degree at MIT. And anyone with a perfect score is going to be fine anyway. There are plenty of world-class institutions in the USA that would be more than happy to accept these peopl.
Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions...
by alasdair_ on Saturday March 21, 2020 @04:16AM
(#22645274)
>I think it's perfectly reasonable to go with a lottery system after some point.
Only the wealthy can afford to apply to every single "prestige" college and university available. A lottery where some people get twenty tickets and others get one or two seems just as silly.