News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by cycrutchfield on Friday March 20, 2020 @07:36PM (#22642842)
I wish more people who fall into the kneejerk "we must emphasize only objective testing" group were aware of things like these. Standardized tests are incredibly game-able, particularly at the upper tail of the distribution. Because of the nature of that distribution, that means that if you selected students only by "objective" measures like standardized test scores, you will be disproportionately selecting for students who are experts at test-taking, not experts at being good students.

The more we can reduce the overdependence on standardized tests, the better we can be at selecting for well-rounded students and not just test-gamers.

Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by barry-cotter on Friday March 20, 2020 @08:15PM (#22643076)
Indeed, much better to select for the kinds of people whose parents know how these things work and can ensure their child has the right letters of recommendation, internships and extracurricular activities. And don’t be terribly specific about what exactly it v is you want; that way you can change it from year to year to ensure the right kind of people get in. Wouldn’t want Harvard to look like Cal Tech or Berkekk OK way would we? That’s what happens when you have a public, objective test instead of being able to select some smart and some connected.
Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by cycrutchfield on Saturday March 21, 2020 @02:05AM (#22644866)
This is not at all what I said, but by all means continue to project your own insecurities.