News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for ... by sodafountan on Friday March 20, 2020 @01:42PM (#22639559)
I agree, as alarming as it sounds I think we'd need something much higher than a 2% fatality rate to justify completely giving up our civil liberties.

If anything it should be the elderly and vulnerable that are forced to isolate while the rest of society slows down for awhile, but even that I think is too egregious at this point.

Re:New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for ... by redisman on Friday March 20, 2020 @02:34PM (#22640195)
You're not gonna get 2% fatality rate without serious quarantine measures. That rate assumes you can get all the serious cases to the ICU and into a ventilator. If you let it grow exponentially, we need to start imagining what is the fatality rate basically without any hospital care. Scaling hospitals will be absolutely impossible once the cases start heading into six and seven figures.
Re:New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for ... by mokus on Friday March 20, 2020 @03:08PM (#22640573)
Lincoln used marshal law during the civil war and even that was deemed unconstitutional in some areas. As long as there are functioning civil courts, marshal law is not considered justified, as I understand it.
Re:New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for ... by schoen on Friday March 20, 2020 @03:34PM (#22640799)
It's "martial" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/martial#English) rather than "marshal" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/marshal#English). The two are homophones, but the first means 'military' and the second is a particular rank or role within an army or government.
Re:New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for ... by selimthegrim on Friday March 20, 2020 @03:03PM (#22640506)
Imperial College doesn’t think that’s going to do enough good