MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions decisions

Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by UncleMeat on Friday March 20, 2020 @01:14PM (#22639306)

This is one of the reasons the subject tests are not especially useful. And since they test knowledge rather than aptitude, making them more difficult doesn't actually find smarter people but instead people who had access to more rigorous high school coursework.

At the GRE level this is even more extreme. For competitive programs a perfect score doesn't distinguish you so taking the test can only harm you. When applying to grad school I was explicitly advised not to take the GRE subject tests.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by applecrazy on Friday March 20, 2020 @02:04PM (#22639779)

The subject tests, IMO, are terrible. I took the Chemistry one right after taking AP (college level) Chemistry, and while I got a full score on that, I got absolutely destroyed on the subject test. They asked trivia-like questions and barely tested for actual chemistry knowledge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT to no longer consider SAT subject tests in admissions... by saagarjha on Friday March 20, 2020 @09:20PM (#22643425)

Interestingly, I had the opposite experience, finding the AP Chemistry exam more difficult than the subject exam. I think part of it is that I have no love for chemistry, so I just memorized the things I needed for the subject test.

[ Parent | on HN ]