News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with MediaWiki. Parent comment

Re:RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with Med... by DonHopkins on Thursday March 19, 2020 @10:11PM (#22633888)
\s and not /s? I didn't realize there was such a thing a reverse sarcasm. Or is that some new fangled TypeScript string escape character?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with Med... by orange8 on Friday March 20, 2020 @06:26AM (#22636456)
\s or /s Dont care. Small minds, small arguments. Atleast you're consistent that way
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with Med... by DonHopkins on Friday March 20, 2020 @07:44AM (#22636763)
It's kind of funny how you boast that you don't want any hand holding from the compiler or IDE, yet you proudly proclaim and demonstrate that you're careless about syntax, spelling, and punctuation. And how you sarcastically complain about immature thoughtless responses, yet you're insulting and patronizing. ;) At least you're consistently self contradictory.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with Med... by orange8 on Friday March 20, 2020 @09:22PM (#22643432)
LOL!! |s
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RFC: Adopt a modern JavaScript framework for use with Med... by DonHopkins on Friday March 20, 2020 @10:02PM (#22643604)
Are you now clear on what Andrew Hejlsberg, the designer of TypeScript and C#, meant by "multi-paradigm" languages?

>I do think one of the things that is luckily happening is that, like as Larry says, everyone's borrowing from everyone, languages are becoming more multi-paradigm.

>I think it's wrong to talk about "Oh, I only like object oriented programming languages, or I only like imperative programming, or functional programming".

Look at the nice table:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_p...

[ Parent | on HN ]