> I'm not clear you know what science is.

> you have not made a scientific argument that gold has more uses than any other element nor does geology.com

> intuitively, gold is less useful and has fewer uses than iron since we tend to measure industrial output in terms of steel and not gold production

> tautologically though, hydrogen takes the cake for having the most uses since if you have enough of it, it can be fused into all the other elements.

I'm not clear you know what an argument is.

You have not been able to determine that I stated findings, not claimed news findings.

The scientific uses will not be by volume, but by the properties of the material. So, I'm also not clear you know what science is.

Can you restate tour claim. Cause I'm not even sure what it was at this point.

> Can you restate tour claim. Cause I'm not even sure what it was at this point.

Gold has uses.