Re:Automated Monopoly hasn't figured out that people just do...
by mprovo1 on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:49AM
(#2262137)
We've had this debate about "catchup mechanisms" or negative feedback loops with my boardgames friends countless times. I personally tend to prefer games with a minimal amount of luck rather than a strong negative feedback loop. I dislike settlers of catan as much as as dislike monopoly. As long as luck is under control, I have no problem losing -- because I can understand where I made my mistakes and be better next time :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Automated Monopoly hasn't figured out that people just do...
by zipdog on Friday February 25, 2011 @10:04AM
(#2262367)
In Settlers the catch-up mechanism is meant to be provided by the other players stopping trade with the leader. In the two-player version this is somewhat explicit (there's a trading cost to be winning)