News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by edw519 on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:02AM (#2262007)
Old idealist geek alert.

I realize that 192% of everyone who ever lived uses Facebook for every possible task 27 hours per day, but every time I read "Facebook", I can't help thinking about AOL in the late 90's..."This is not the way is was meant to be."

We got away from the pseudo-monopolistic controls of AT&T, IBM, the US government, and finally AOL to enjoy the golden days of the world wide web from 2000 to 2005. Oh how glorious it almost was. Then, like self-mutilating OCD addicts on Xanex, we couldn't stand the freedom and quickly jumped to the next most promising walled garden.

FWIW, I used Chrome for the first time yesterday and I love it! No going back to ie or Firefox for me. Can't access Facebook? No problem for me; all I ever wanted was a simple browser and access to the open world.

No, yahoo, I won't use my Facebook id to get my email. No, <insert Website 2.whatever name>, I don't use Facebook. And no Facebook, Twitter, itunes, and the rest of you guys who want to wall us off, I will not use you. (And don't think I'm not starting to worry about you too, Google.)

I know, I know, I still use my Giant Eagle/GetGo frequent buyer card, so everyone on the internets probably knows that I bought aspirin last night, but I'm still clinging to my last little bit of freedom.

Respectfully yours,

The last free hacker standing, clinging tightly to my mouse and keyboard

Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by RiderOfGiraffes on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:08AM (#2262025)
Co-signed - fellow free hacker.

You're not alone. I realised that Facebook makes it possible for completely non-computery people to share pictures, write notes, have on-line conversations, have a sort-of blog, all in a one-stop shop. When my older niece started to use it I realised that there were half a dozen other facilities that would serve her better, but it's the 80/20 rule. For essentially zero effort she got more than she otherwise could have.

I sigh, but it's the way it is. It's the way it was with AOL, and maybe something will kill it eventually, but it's the way it is now.

I look forward to seeing where it will go, and I hope it's better than anything we can currently imagine.

It probably will.

ADDED IN EDIT:

When I clicked the link I got:

    You are using an incompatible web browser.
    Sorry, we're not able to support your browser.
    Please use one of the following browsers:

      * Mozilla Firefox
      * Safari
      * Microsoft Internet Explorer 
I'm using a very old Firefox.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by thornjm on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:28AM (#2262081)
I don't think the page is doing any processing or browser identification. I think it just displays the same static message regardless of how and who visits it.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by vinsan on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:26AM (#2262073)
I don't think the page checks for the browser version. I am using the latest version of Firefox (3.6.13) and still get the same message.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by MediaBehavior on Friday February 25, 2011 @09:19AM (#2262223)
Yes. http://www.facebook.com/common/browser.php is a direct link - and displays from Safari 5.x or FF 3.6.13/Mac

EDIT: So, presumably one could access it from IE as well (not something I can test from here).

Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by ja27 on Friday February 25, 2011 @09:21AM (#2262230)
The message when browsing with Chrome is "Sorry, we're not cool enough to support your browser. Please keep it real with one of the following browsers:"
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by Charuru on Friday February 25, 2011 @08:28AM (#2262083)
That's because that's the page you're directed to when they detect an incompatible browser. This page is probably static.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by ams6110 on Friday February 25, 2011 @10:09AM (#2262381)
I've tried Chrome on Mac OS X and found it to be generally faster than Safari but also a bit unstable. Freezing up occasionally etc. It's solid and blazing fast on Windows though.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by tvon on Friday February 25, 2011 @10:57AM (#2262539)
I'd probably be using Chrome if a) you could open external links in new windows and b) the "loading" indicator wasn't some kind of horrible practical joke.
Re:Is the omission of Chrome from the suggested list of brow... by tvon on Friday February 25, 2011 @10:56AM (#2262534)
You can access Facebook fine with Chrome, fwiw.