Re:Actual Causality (2016)
by juskrey on Monday March 16, 2020 @04:58PM
(#22597686)
A book on casualty with no any single hint on mutual information.. hm
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Not surprising, since mutual information is a fundamentally non-causal concept. This is easily seen by nothing that the mutual information of X and Y is the same as the mutual information of Y and X, which means that mutual information can't distinguish between "X causes Y" and "Y causes X".
Re:Actual Causality (2016)
by skat20phys on Monday March 16, 2020 @11:01PM
(#22601169)
There are causal accounts that use mutual information and its variants though. A lot of them introduce notions of directed mutual information and other similar concepts.