News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence is now in. Parent comment

Re:Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence i... by Mikhail_Edoshin on Monday March 16, 2020 @10:43AM (#22593134)
How do you know?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence i... by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday March 16, 2020 @04:31PM (#22597334)
That must be the cheapest attempt at shifting the burden of proof I've encountered yet.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence i... by Mikhail_Edoshin on Monday March 16, 2020 @05:08PM (#22597832)
A sane rational logical person has an addiction. The sane rational logical tools he has do not help him to get rid of it. This means he cannot trust them. There's a flaw somewhere and he doesn't know where. They are not good for any conclusion, including the agency and power of that bar. The best he can do is to drop them and admit he knows nothing. Then there's a chance to learn something new that may help with that addiction.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence i... by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday March 16, 2020 @06:56PM (#22599117)
Which doesn't make a Zagnut bar an agent that has power, does it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Alcoholics Anonymous vs. other approaches: the evidence i... by Mikhail_Edoshin on Tuesday March 17, 2020 @02:32AM (#22602322)
I don't know.
[ Parent | on HN ]