Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'risking lives'

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by Twisell on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:04PM (#22584646)

There is however another underlying gamble. If they let the virus freely evolve and spread this might also give it more opportunities to mutate and maybe become more lethal whereas country that try to mitigate contagion won't offer as many hosts to try random forks...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by gruez on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:09PM (#22584692)

>this might also give it more opportunities to mutate and maybe become more lethal

AFAIK viruses tend to mutate to be less lethal because killing the host is bad for reproduction.

random source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu

>This is a common occurrence with influenza viruses: there is a tendency for pathogenic viruses to become less lethal with time, as the hosts of more dangerous strains tend to die out

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by klipt on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:44PM (#22585038)

The first wave of the Spanish Flu mostly killed the elderly. The second wave mutated and killed young, normally healthy people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu#Deadly_second_wave

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by CraigJPerry on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:50PM (#22585102)

I see that same line being peddled out of context like this frequently these days. When you point out the young people factor you really also need to point out why that was the case and it wasn’t because of the mutation of the virus...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by klipt on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:58PM (#22585200)

Wikipedia says it was a mutation, although the selective pressure on that mutation (war) is something we hopefully won't have in today's circumstances.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by empath75 on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:11PM (#22584714)

There is very little evolutionary pressure to mutate to a more lethal variant and a lot of pressure to mutate to less dangerous variant.

The ideal evolutionary strategy is to produce excess bodily fluids from sweating, coughing and sneezing, while not making people so sick that they lay down and stay home, let alone die.

Viruses don’t get bonus points for being lethal, unlike certain video games.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by glaberficken on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:39PM (#22584975)

Actually this is modeled quite well in "Plague Inc" (the game) if you mutate the virus towards being too lethal it will not spread fast enough to annihilate the entire population.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by empath75 on Sunday March 15, 2020 @08:28PM (#22588345)

Right but the point of the game is still to kill a lot of people and that’s not something that viruses care about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Coronavirus: Some scientists say UK virus strategy is 'ri... by hackerNoose on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:13PM (#22584736)

If I'm not mistaken the Spanish flue actually mutated to become more lethal.

[ Parent | on HN ]