News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by garmaine on Saturday March 14, 2020 @11:23PM (#22580964)
> The virus was spread at the market. It didn't start at the market.

The virus came from bats. The "wildlife market" in question sold raw bat meat. How else would it have gotten there?

Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by dboreham on Sunday March 15, 2020 @12:03AM (#22581156)
Is this known for a fact? I thought the bat angle was more a most likely scenario but not proven.
Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by adinobro on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:25AM (#22581517)
No, Chinese markets generally don't sell bat meat or eat bats.

They eat lots of animals but bats are not one of them. (I'm sure there is a village in China where they do eat bats. It is a big country.)

The photos you see online of Chinese people eating bats are Tourist in the Pacific.

Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by garmaine on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:40AM (#22581571)
Correct, Chinese markets generally don't sell such things. I know, I'm Chinese ;)

But this particular part of China does. It's more a subculture derived from one of the minority groups in that province, but it's there.

Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by SZJX on Sunday March 15, 2020 @05:07AM (#22582300)
Never heard about such a thing. Sounds like some sort of conspiracy theory unless you have concrete proof of that.

The original hypothesis was that some other animal sold at the market acted as an intermediate host between bat and human, just like the case in 2003 SARS, but this is also not proven.

Re:Open letter from Italy to the international scientific co... by dependenttypes on Sunday March 15, 2020 @09:52AM (#22583480)
Conspiracy theory has a specific meaning. Their claim might be false but even if this is the case they are not implying the existence of any conspiracy.