News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by mehrdadn on Saturday March 14, 2020 @07:37AM (#22574568)
> why not try it?

I imagine not everyone feels comfortable potentially killing someone with a creation of theirs that they're not confident in, even if others are willing to risk it.

Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by markgavalda on Saturday March 14, 2020 @07:42AM (#22574591)
It's the other way around though: it's not them or their creation that is killing the patient, it's the virus. There's a big difference between their creation being unable to save the patient and actively killing them.
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by Gasp0de on Saturday March 14, 2020 @07:56AM (#22574642)
That's the thing with giving people stuff that hasn't been tested on anyone before: It might actively kill them, not just not prevent them from being killed by the virus.
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by darkerside on Saturday March 14, 2020 @08:08AM (#22574682)
That's a very optimistic viewpoint. In reality, it is certainly possible that their creation could kill the patient before the virus does.
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by vintermann on Saturday March 14, 2020 @07:52AM (#22574636)
If everyone always demanded the "best" treatment according to our current knowledge, we might never find out there was anything better than leeches...
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by forkexec on Saturday March 14, 2020 @12:38PM (#22576570)
Informed consent of X or X's health POA determines what happens, not random doctors.