Re:Surviving the coronavirus, then testing positive again
by syllogism on Friday March 13, 2020 @12:17PM
(#22568494)
This outbreak has made me realise how I've gone my whole adult life without knowing some basic things about bacteria and viruses. Like, I never knew about how soap dissolves the virus's outer coating...
Anyway apparently hot and wet is good for bacteria, but cold is better for viruses. The bit that made it click for me is that viruses aren't metabolising anything outside of the host-cell, so the best a virus can hope for is to not be destroyed -- and cold is a better preservative.
I'm still not sure whether hot and humid is better than hot and dry though? I think I read that hot and dry is worse, because it increases evaporation.
Re:Surviving the coronavirus, then testing positive again
by ch4s3 on Friday March 13, 2020 @12:30PM
(#22568631)
> I never knew about how soap dissolves the virus's outer coating
That's not true for every type of virus, but it is true for corona viruses.
Re:Surviving the coronavirus, then testing positive again
by lonelappde on Friday March 13, 2020 @12:38PM
(#22568690)
Humidity makes flu less contagious, likely
because something about the wet heavy air deactivates airborne viruses.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/27533-f...
Re:Surviving the coronavirus, then testing positive again
by thisisnico on Friday March 13, 2020 @12:10PM
(#22568428)
Welcome to living anywhere near the great lakes in summertime.
That's odd to me because I associate warm and wet with uncleanliness and festering cesspools.