Using a throwaway. I was arrested and had technology devices raided. Cellebrite was able to bypass the login screen and encryption of my powered on seized Android cellphone, but they were not able to access a different Android phone that was powered down fully.

Nobody was able to access my Veracrypt computers.

Thanks for the post.

I'm curious, did they try to put any pressure on you to unlock the devices for them?

During my initial arrest they politely asked me once for the passwords, which I declined. Around 9 months later they asked my legal counsel for the passwords, which was declined.

I found a subsequent court case where my same prosecutor tried via the court system to get a different defendant to reveal their passwords and they failed. Oh well.

Reading their internal emails regarding encryption and their general tech capabilities was enlightening.

AMAA if you'd like.

Looking back, was there any opportunity you missed to shut off the powered-on phone?

Apparently they knocked for several minutes before letting themselves in. I had gone to sleep only a couple hours before due to a late night, and as a double whammy I took some melatonin so I was completely out of it.

Obviously I would never obstruct justice but in theory had I heard them knocking, there would have been plenty of time to do so.

Ironically half the "evidence" they recovered from the phone actually would have helped my case if it had gone to trial because it showed no criminal intent and no attempt to hide from law enforcement. In short, if they never gained access to that phone on their own it may have been in my interests to provide the passwords for that specific device but who knows.

> Reading their internal emails regarding encryption and their general tech capabilities was enlightening.

Please elaborate.

What aspects did you find enlightening about their encryption and general tech capabilities?

What were they looking for? I'd understand if you don't want to answer that.

They were looking for general evidence of guilt as I was accused of a purely technological crime. They were not looking for specific files or anything.

Did you have a strong (10+ character, alphanumeric) password on the device they were able to get into?

What did they suspect you did?

If I say the specifics it will be obvious who I am because it was front page news, not that I really mind too much I suppose but I'll refrain for now. Suffice to say the question wasn't whether I did the actions but whether it was illegal or not. Turns out it is not illegal in the USA according to their prosecutors and we'll never find out if it was illegal in Canada because it will never go to trial due to withdrawn charges. Some charges were however ruled not a crime during an early hearing by the judge and the remaining were dropped.

What country was that in?

I'm in Canada but the investigation was with both the FBI and RCMP. The FBI offered tech assistance with encryption matters as well according to emails between the two agencies.

A (still current) cellebrite ambassador told me in 2016-2017 that the most recent Samsung flagship back then, if encrypted, was safe from all attacks they had.